Corrections Policy
How TechSpecs handles errors and updates - our commitment to correcting mistakes promptly, transparently, and on the record.
We fix mistakes promptly - and we never hide them
TechSpecsworks hard to be accurate, but no publisher is infallible. When we get something wrong, we correct it openly and on the record. We do not quietly delete errors, edit them out without acknowledgement, or pretend they never happened. Trust is built on what we do when we’re wrong - so substantive corrections are made transparently, with a note that explains what changed.
Last updated: June 2026
How we handle changes
Not every edit is equal. We scale our response to the weight of the change - from a silent typo fix to a prominent retraction - so the record always matches reality.
Minor fixes
Typos, broken links, formatting slips, or a misplaced caption. We clean these up the moment we notice them - they don't change meaning, so they don't carry a note.
Factual corrections
A wrong specification, an inaccurate figure, or a claim that doesn't hold up. We correct the page and, where the error was material, add a dated note explaining exactly what changed and why.
Updates
New information - a software update, a price change, a newer model - that shifts our analysis. We revise the content and refresh its date rather than leave stale guidance in place.
Significant retractions
When a core conclusion turns out to be wrong, hiding it isn't an option. We post a clear, prominent note at the top of the affected page so no reader is left acting on bad advice.
Found an error? Here’s how to report it
Spotted something off in a review, a spec sheet, a guide, or any other page? Tell us. A few details up front let us verify and fix it as quickly as possible.
- 1
The page URL
Paste the exact link to the review, spec sheet, guide, or article where you found the problem - and the section, if it's a long page.
- 2
What you believe is wrong
Tell us precisely what looks incorrect: the figure that's off, the spec that doesn't match, or the claim you're questioning.
- 3
A source, if you have one
A manufacturer spec page, a datasheet, or any primary reference helps us verify and fix the error far faster.
Mark your message as a correction and we’ll move it to the front of the queue.
Credit where it’s due
We’re grateful to the readers who help us stay accurate, and we’re happy to credit substantive corrections where it’s appropriate to do so. To be clear, though: reader feedback never buys influence over our verdicts and never changes our editorial independence. Pointing out a genuine mistake earns our thanks and a faster fix - nothing more, nothing less.
Seen something we got wrong?
Every report makes our coverage more reliable for the next reader. Send us the details and we’ll look into it - and fix it openly if you’re right.